Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Candidate of inguistics, Payame Noor University (PNU), Tehran, Iran.

2 Professor in Linguistics, Payame Noor University (PNU), Tehran, Iran.

3 Associate Professor in linguistics, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to investigate the effect of the social variables of age, gender and education of lawyers on the verbal interactions of judges with them in legal events in the framework of forensic sociolinguistics. The statistical population of the research includes lawyers in Mashhad, Iran, and the sample selection method is purposeful sampling until the saturation of information is reached. The research approach is qualitative research, its analysis method is thematic analysis and its tool is semi-structured interview. The subject of the research is to investigate the verbal interactions of judges with lawyers in legal events, such as hearings, interrogations, investigations and trials, in Mashhad, in 1401. For this purpose, the contents and themes of the interviews were coded in three stages. In an interview with 24 volunteers from available lawyers, it was found that superior and subordinate relationships prevail in legal events, and many judges exercise power through language. The results of the research show that the age, gender and education of lawyers have an effect on the way the judge speaks to them, answers and even issues a verdict. Gender has been of special importance and gender stereotypes are very prominent in this field. One of the important issues expressed by the lawyers in the interviews was the importance of the personality of the judge and the personality of the lawyer in the verbal interactions of the judges with the lawyers, which indicates that the personality of the people themselves is much more important and influential than their age, gender and education. In addition, increasing age is also an important variable, and many lawyers stated that the behavior of appeal judges is usually better because they are older, and lawyers also act more mature with increasing age. After all, in general, judges deal better with older lawyers both in tone and type of speech.

Keywords

Main Subjects

آقاگل‏زاده، فردوس. (1390). زبان‏شناسی حقوقی (نظری و کاربردی)؛ تهران: نشر علم.
استاجی، اعظم؛ صبری، مژگان؛ الیاسی، محمود. (1396). «معرفی اجمالی زبان‌شناسی حقوقی اجتماعی و کاربردهای آن». مجلة زبان کاوی. شمارة ۵. صص 83 - 96.
زائری، عظیمه؛ آقاگل‏زاده، فردوس؛ عامری، حیات. (1396). «توصیف و تحلیل شیوه‌های زبانی و فرازبانی وکلا جهت اقناع در دادگاه‌های علنی ایران: تحلیل گفتمان دادگاه کیفری (زبان‌شناسی حقوقی)». جستارهای زبانی. ۸ (۵). صص ۱۵۸-۱۳۹-۱۵۸.
صانعی، پرویز. (1381). حقوق و اجتماع: رابطة حقوق با عوامل اجتماعی و روانی. تهران: انتشارات طرح نو.
صبری، مژگان؛ استاجی، اعظم؛ الیاسی، محمود. (1397). «تحلیل گفتمان پلیس-متهم در حوزۀ زبان‏شناسی اجتماعی حقوقی». فصلنامة زبان‏شناسی اجتماعی. دورۀ دوم. شمارۀ اول (پیاپی 3). صص 99-109.
کاتوزیان، ناصر. (1389). قانون مدنی در نظم حقوقی کنونی. ویرایش چهارم، چاپ بیست و پنجم، تهران: نشر میزان.
موسوی، سیدفضل‏اله؛ موسوی، سیدمهدی؛ رمضانی، احمد. (1390). «نقش زبان‏شناسی قضایی در تحقق عدالت قضایی». حقوق تطبیقی (نامه مفید). 7 (17)(2 (88)). صص 3-24.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Oancea, C-V. (2018). Unravelling identity: Sociolinguistics and forensic linguistics. The Annals of Ovidius University of Constana: Philology Series, 2,75-82.
Coulthard, M., & Johnson, A. (2007). An introduction to forensics: Language in evidence. NewYork: Routledge Co.
Groot, R. G. (2003). Language and Law. The Netherlands: Maastritcht University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1973). Explorations in the functions of language. London: Edward Arnold.
Hlioui, A. (2020). A cognitive and systemic functional approach of the use of personal pronouns in legal discourse: Life insurance contracts and court hearings as a case study. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 27(1), 99–101.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar (Vol.1): Theoretical prerequisites. Stan‏ford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R.W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sanni, O. O. (2016). The role of forensic linguists in courtroom cross-examinations. IFE Studies in Engliah Language (ISEL), 12(2),1-13.
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics(Vol. 1): Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wardhaugh, R. (1986). An Introduction to sociolinguistics. USA: Basil Blackwell Ltd