Analyzing the speech acts of votes in women’s divorce cases from the perspective of pragmatics: a study within the framework of Forensic linguistics

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant professor of linguistics -Faculty of English Language and Literature-Yasouj university

2 M.A in General linguistics- Department of English language and literature- Faculty of Humanities- Yasouj University

3 English language and literature- Faculty of Humanities- Yasouj University

Abstract

From the perspective of pragmatics and discourse analysis, this research examines the speech acts of legal opinions. Searle divides speech acts into five types: declarative, directive, expressive, representative, and commissive. The present study aimed to investigate the types of speech acts and their frequency in divorce case judgments based on Searle's classification. The present research was conducted using a descriptive-analytical and corpus-based method. The data were randomly collected in the form of 50 judgments from the National Judicial Decisions System. The research corpus includes 1364 speech acts extracted from the text of these judgments. Then, the types of speech acts and their frequencies were identified and analyzed based on specific principles. The findings showed that the highest frequency belonged to representative speech acts with 38%, and declarative and directive speech acts were used with an almost equal frequency of 27%. The findings also indicated that the judge – who is the author of these texts – in court and judicial authorities, based on evidence, documents, and their knowledge, issues verdicts and is always in a position where they confirm their opinion with representative and declarative acts and persuade their audience to take action with directive acts.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Aghagolzadeh, Ferdows (1384) Linguistics: A new approach in applied linguistics. [Conference presentation].Proceedings of the first conference of the Iranian Linguistic Association, Tehran: Allameh Tabatabai University Publications, 215- 225.[In Persian].
Aghagolzadeh, Ferdows (2010). Forensic linguistics (theoretical and applied). Neviseh Parsi, 2nd edition, 1391.[In Persian]
 
Aghagolzadeh, Ferdows (2012). Forensic linguistics: Legal discourse analysis. [Conference presentation].Proceedings of the first national conference of legal linguistics: Forensic discourse analysis: Ferdows Aghagolzadeh. Tehran: Neviseh Parsi.[In Persian]
 
Badakhshan, Ibrahim; Dehghan, Farshad and Dehghan, Massoud (2014). Analysis of the pragmatic role of Austin and Searle's theory of speech acts in the investigation text.[In Persian]
 
Proceedings of the second forensic linguistics conference, Tehran, Iran, Iranian Linguistics Association, (November 28, 2014). 22 p.[In Persian]
Pahlavan- nejad, Mohammad Reza; Estehbanati, Lida (2015). Review of speech acts in the speeches of the presidents of Iran and the United States at the United Nations, September 2016, Journal of Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences of Tabriz University: Research of Foreign Languages. Volume 51, Number 208. Fall and winter 1387. 1- 24.[In Persian]
Pahlavan-nejad, Mohammad Reza; Rajab-zadeh, Mehdi (2009). Textual analysis of Imam Reza's Ziyaratnama (a.s.) based on the speech act theory, Scientific-Research Journal Essays in Philosophy and Kalam, No. 85. Autumn and Winter 2019, 37 - 54.[In Persian]
Jalali, Vale (2018). Applied linguistics. [Conference presentation].The Second International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and History Studies.[In Persian]
Saadat Mandi, Marzieh; Madras Khabani, Shahram & Pordana, Natasha (2015). The effect of teaching the pragmatic factors of the language on the requested speech act of Farsi English learners.[Conference presentation]. The Fourth National Discourse Analysis and Pragmatics Conference. 2015.[In Persian]
Shuy, Roger W. (2004). Forensic linguistics. Translated by  Azam Staji's, Judiciary Legal Magazine, No.: 48-49, year 69.  365- 380.[In Persian]
Shafaqi, Maryam (2012). Speech act of promise in political discourse, Journal of Linguistic Inquiries, No. 14,141 to 158.[In Persian]
 
Sadeghi Fasaei, Sahila; Irfanmanesh, Iman (2014). "Methodological foundations of documentary research in social sciences", Culture strategy magazine, number 29.[In Persian]
Safavi, Kourosh (1379, A). An introduction to semantics, Tehran: Research Institute of Islamic Culture and Art.[In Persian]
Safavi, Koroush (1390, b). An introduction to semantics (4th edition). Tehran: Research Institute of Islamic Culture and Art.[In Persian]
Safi, Nafiseh (2006). The verbal characteristics of arguments between men and women in the family court of Tehran. M.A thesis, linguistics department, Payam Noor University, Tehran.[In Persian]
Askari Mateen, Sajjad & Rahimi, Ali (1391). Analysis of legal discourse; analyzing the role of business in the legal context. Quarterly Journal of Linguistic Studies, No. 16, 4th period. Winter 2012, 151- 172.[In Persian]
Farazandepour, Faezeh (2012). Analysis of stylistic characteristics of legal texts and presentation of principles in order to develop simple legal language in Iran. [Conference presentation].In the Proceedings of the First National Conference of Legal Linguistics: Legal Discourse Analysis. From pp. 123-142.[In Persian]
Civil Law, approved on 20/2/1307, with subsequent amendments and additions.[In Persian].
Lasani, Mateen al-Sadat; Brimani, Shaaban (1392). Forensic linguistics: Analyzing the speech of people present in the courts of Tehran based on the principles of Grice's cooperation. Proceedings of the First National Conference of Legal Linguistics: Legal Discourse Analysis. [Conference presentation],99-111.[In Persian]
Najafi Ayuki, Ali; Rasool Nia, &Amir Hossein Kaveh Noushabadi, Alireza (2016). The textual analysis of Shagshaqiyah's sermon based on Searle's speech act theory, Nahj al-Balagha Scientific-Research Journal (Ministry of Science), No. 19. Autumn 2016,1 to 17.[In Persian].
 

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics