A cross-cultural study of the speech act of advice in Persian and English virtual communication

Articles in Press

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Payame Noor University, PO BOX 19395-3697

2 Department of English Language and Literature,, Paya,me Noor University,, Tehran, Iran

10.30473/il.2025.75265.1706

Abstract

The present study was conducted to investigate the advice strategies in comments posted in Persian and English in virtual communication. For this purpose, data were randomly collected from comments in response to Twitter posts seeking advice during the months of July 2023 to July 2024. About 787 comments in English and Persian collected from 40 Twitter posts were analyzed based on the Lucher (2006) advice speech act model for the use of discursive moves, relational work, and linguistic realization. The overall results show that the frequency of advice strategies in the Persian corpus is significantly higher than in the English corpus. Also, the most frequent discourse moves in both Persian and English corpora included advice, explanation, and assessment. In addition, in relational work, the strategies of boosters, use of humor, and hedges were most frequent in the Persian corpus, while the strategies of boosters, hedges, and criticism were most frequent in the English corpus. The results of the corpus analysis in the use of linguistic realization show that the use of imperative structures is most frequent in the Persian corpus, while in the English corpus, the conditional structure is most frequent.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

 
Ahangar, A. A., Mojahedi Rezaeian, S., & Esfandiarpoor, F. (2020). Investigating the effect of addressee’s power on the choice of politeness strategies in speech act of advice giving in Persian, Journal of Sociolinguistic, 2(10), 85-110 [in Persian].
Aliakbari, M., Aghaee, R., & AzimiAmoli, F. (2015).  Directness vs. indirectness: A study of the linguistic choices of Persian speakers when giving advice, English Linguistics Research, 4(2), 55-65. doi: 10.5430/elr.v4n2p55
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Eisenchlas, S. A. (2012). Gendered discursive practices on-line. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 335-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.02.001
El-Dakhs, D. A. S. (2021). #StayHome- A pragmatic analysis of COVID-19 health advice I in Saudi and Australian tweets. Language & Dialogue, 11(2), 223-245. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00089.dak
Goldsmith, D. (2000). Soliciting advice: The role of sequential placement in mitigating face threat. Communication Monograph, 67(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750009376492
Hampel, E. (2015). “Mama Zimbi, pls help me!”- Gender differences in (im)politeness in Ghanaian English advice-giving on Facebook. Journal of Politeness Research,11(1), 99-103. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2015-0005
Hay, J. (2000). Functions of humor in the conversations of men and women. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 709–742. ttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00069-7
Hernández-Flores, N. (1999). Politeness ideology in Spanish colloquial conversation: The case of advice. Pragmatics, 9(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.9.1.04her
Hinkel, E. (1997). Appropriateness of advice: DCT and multiple choice data. Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.1.1
Hopkinson, C. (2021). Realizations of oppositional speech acts in English: A contrastive analysis of discourse in L1 and L2 settings. Intercultural Pragmatics, 18(2), 163-202. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2021-2002
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses. University of Michigan Press. https://www.press.umich.edu/6719/disciplinary_discourses_michigan_classics_ed
Kouper, I. (2010). The pragmatic of peer advice in a liveJournal Community. Lagnuage@Internet, retrived online in November 2021 from https://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2010/2464.
Locher, M. A. (2006). Polite behavior within relational work: the discursive approach to politeness. Multilingua 25, 249_267. https://doi.org/10.1515/MULTI.2006.015
Locher, M. A., & Hoffman, A. (2006). The emergence of the identity of a fictional expert advice-giver in an American internet advice column. Text & Talk, 26, 69-106. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.004
Locher, M. A., & Limberg, H. (2012).  Introduction to advice in discourse.  In H. Limberg & M. A.  Locher (Eds.), Advice in discourse (pp. 1-27). John Benjamins.
Locher, M.A., & Watts, R. J. (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 1, 9–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9
Locher, M.A., & Watts, R. J. (2008). Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behavior. In D. Bousfield, & M.A. Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice (pp. 77–99). Mouton De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208344.2.77
Martínez-Flor, A. (2003). Non-native speakers’ production of advice acts: The effects of proficiency. RESLA, 16, 139–153. https://rael.aesla.org.es/index.php/RAEL/article/view/92
McFedries, P. (2007). All a-Twitter. IEEE Spectrum, 44, 84. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSPEC. 2007.4337670
Morrow, P. R. (2006). Telling about problems and giving advice in an Internet discussion forum: some discourse features. Discourse Studies, 8, 531-548. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606061876
Morrow, P. R. (2017). Requesting and advice giving. In C. R. Hoffman & W. Bublitz (Eds.). Pragmatics and social media (pp. 661-690). De Gruyter Mouton.
Pinto, D. (2010). Lost in subtitle translations: The case of advice in the English subtitles of Spanish films. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2010.012
Pishghadam, R., & Sharafadini, M. (2011). A contrastive study into the realization of suggestion speech act: Persian vs English. Canadian Social Science, 7(4), 230-239. https://doi.org/10.3968/j.css.1923669720110704.360
Pudlinski, C. (1998). Giving advice on a consumer-run warm line: implicit and dilemmatic practices. Communication Studies, 49(4): 322_341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979809368542
Sarangi, S. & Clarke, A. (2002). Zones of expertise and the management of uncertainty in genetics risk communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction 35(2), 139-171. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3502_2
Searle, J. (1976). The classification of illocutionary acts, Language and Society, 5, 1–24. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837
Silverman, D. (1997). Discourses of counselling: HIV counselling as social interaction. Sage.
Trosborg, A. (1995). Interlanguage pragmatics: Requests, complaints, and apologies. De Gruyter Mouton.
Trevino, L. K., Lenge, R. H., & Daft, R. L. (1987). Media symbolism and media choice in organizations: A symbolic interactionist perspective, Communication Research, 14, 553-574.
van Popple, L. (2018). Anticipating resistance to health advice: A speech act perspective, Discourse Processes, 1-13. Doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2018.1470440
Walther, J. B., & Boyd, S. (2002). Attraction to computer-mediated social support. In C. A. Lin & D. Atkin (Eds.), Communication technology and society: Audience adoption and uses (pp. 153-188). Hampton Press.
 
Journal of Sociolinguistics

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 23 June 2026

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics