The Study of Sexism Representation in Persian Word Formation: A Corpus-based Approach

Foroughan Geransaye, Fateme; Moloodi, Amirsaeid; Khormaee, Alireza

doi:10.30473/il.2019.43498.1219

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

¹ PhD Candidate of Linguistics, Shiraz University

² Assistant Professor of Linguistics, Shiraz University

³ Associate Professor of Linguistics, Shiraz University

https://doi.org/10.30473/il.2019.43498.1219

Abstract

Sexism in language is a well-known discourse in linguistics. In sexist language, the choice of particular linguistic variations leads to gender bias in favor of one gender and against the other. Sexism has been widely researched through the corpus-based methods in international studies but it has not been investigated by analytical corpus processes in Iranian contexts. This study discusses sexism in Persian language word formation in Hamshahri Corpus version 2 based on Baker’s (2006, 2010, 2017) corpus-based approach. To this end, the words formed by the morphemes man and woman were selected as the representative words in each gender category and the frequency and concordance were explored using Antconc. The data were then examined by first assigning semantic values to the corpus and then running statistical tests. The results showed the existence of sexism in the word formation of the Contemporary Written Persian Language; it seems that the morpheme man is used more frequently than woman in forming words in Persian Language. Moreover, the findings showed that positive characters are represented by the morpheme man and negative characters are represented by the morpheme woman. This study can reveal parts of Iranian’s viewpoints of sexism in order to stop such a social problem.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

پاک‏نهاد جبروتی، مریم. (1379). فرادستی و فرودستی در زبان. مجموعه مقالات دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، 91، 103-125.

جان نژاد، محسن. (1385). تفاوت‏های زبانی میان گویشوران مرد و زن ایرانی در برخی از موقعیت‏های تعامل مکالمه‏ای بر پایۀ میزان کلام. پژوهش ادبیات معاصرجهان، 34، 31-46.

داوری اردکانی، نگار. و عیار، عطیه. (1387). کنکاشی در پژوهش‏های زبان‏شناسی جنسیت. مطالعات راهبردی زنان، 42، 162-181.

صفوی، کوروش. (1392). درآمدی بر معنی‏شناسی. تهران: انتشارات سورۀ مهر.

علی‏نژاد، بتول. (1384). مبانی شناختی مقولۀ جنس در زبان

فارسی. ادب و زبان فارسی، 22، 81-104.

محمودی بختیاری، بهروز.، افخمی، علی. و تاج‏آبادی، فرزانه. (1390). بازتاب اندیشۀ مردسالارانه در زبان فارسی: پژوهشی در جامعه‏شناسی. زن در فرهنگ و هنر، 2(4)، 91-107.

مؤمنی، مریم. و سیف‏اللهی، حسین. (1387). زبان و جنسیت. بازتاب اندیشه، 96، 66-71.

میرسعیدی، عاطفه. (1391). فارسی کنونی به‏عنوان یک زبان جنسیت‏گرا. دو فصلنامه علمی-پژوهشی زبان پژوهی دانشگاه الزهرا (س)، 3(6)، 201-222.

نعمتی، آزاده. (1382). تحلیلی بر تفاوت‏های زبانی زنان و مردان، تحقیقی در جامعه‏شناسی زبان. مجلۀ دانشکدۀ علوم انسانی دانشگاه سمنان، 5، 73-92.

AleAhmad, A., Amiri, H., Darrudi, E., Rahgozar, M., & Oroumchian, F. (2009). Hamshahri: A standard Persian text collection. Knowledge-Based Systems, 22(5), 382-387.

Anthony, L. (2014). AntConc (Version 3.4.3) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University, Retrieved from http://www. laurenceanthony.net/ software/ antconc/.

Assi, S.‎ M.‎ (1997)‎.‎ Farsi linguistic database (FLDB).‎International Journal of Lexicography, 10(3), 5.

Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Baker, P. (2010). Sociolinguistics and corpus linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Baker, P. (2017). Corpus-based discourse analysis [Video lecture]. Retrieved from https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/corpus-linguistics/5/register?utm_campaign =corpus-linguistics 5&utm_content= GoToWeek_3&utm_medium=futurelearn_organic_email&utm_source=CRM_email&utm_term=CP_1_WTW_w3.

Bijankhan, M., Sheykhzadegan, J., Bahrani, M., & Ghayoomi, M. (2011). Lessons from building a Persian written corpus: Peykare. Language resources and evaluation, 45(2), 143-164.

Bolinger, D. (1980). Language, the loaded weapon. London: Longman.

Booij, G. (2007). The grammar of words: An Introduction to morphology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Burr, V. (1995). An introduction to social constructionism. London: Routledge.

Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock.

Fuertes-Olivera, P. A. (2007). A corpus-based view of lexical gender in written Business English. English for Specific Purposes, 26(2), 219-234.

Holmes, J. (2001). A corpus-based view of gender in New Zealand. In Hellinger, M., & Bußmann, H. (Eds.), Gender across Languages (pp. 115-136). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Johnstone, B. (2008). Discourse analysis. Tehran: Rahnama.

Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper Colophon.

Lei, X. (2006). Sexism in language. Journal of Language and Linguistics, 5(1), 87-94.

Litosseliti, L. (2006). Gender and language theory and practice. London: Hodder Arnold.

McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Parker, I. (1992). Discourse dynamics: Critical analysis for social and individual psychology. London: Routledge.

Partington, A. (2006). The linguistics of laughter: A corpus-assisted study of laughter-talk. London: Routledge.

Pearce, M. (2008). Investigating the collocational behaviour of man and woman in the British National Corpus using Sketch Engine 1. Corpora, 3(1), 1-29.

Pérez-Sabater, C. (2015). Research on sexist language in EFL literature: towards a non-sexist approach. In Porta Linguarum. Revista Internacional de Didáctica de las Lenguas Extranjeras, 23(1), 187-203.

Rey, J. M. (2014). Changing gender roles in popular culture. Variation in English: Multi-dimensional Studies, 138.

Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language (Vol. 4). University of Chicago Press.

Stubbs, M. (1996). Text and corpus analysis: Computer-assisted studies of language and culture. Oxford: Blackwell.

Journal of Sociolinguistics

The Study of Sexism Representation in Persian Word Formation: A Corpus-based Approach

References

References

Volume 2, Issue 4 (Serial 6) - Serial Number 6
June 2019
Pages 11-20

The Study of Sexism Representation in Persian Word Formation: A Corpus-based Approach

References

References

Volume 2, Issue 4 (Serial 6) - Serial Number 6June 2019Pages 11-20

Volume 2, Issue 4 (Serial 6) - Serial Number 6
June 2019
Pages 11-20