Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD in Linguistics, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies

2 Professor of Linguistics, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies

3 . Associate professor of Linguistics, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies

Abstract

Speakers’ linguistic behavior regarding the usage of lectal variations (regional, Shirazi and Standard varieties), creates mixed responses which are influenced by social variables, the age, gender, education and place of residence. The favorable and unfavorable reactions toward the regional lectals have led to the formation of social categorizations from a cognitive point of view. This field study describes the correlation between social layers and linguistic forms in Fars Province. Data collection was carried out through a survey method by 490 speakers from Shiraz, Marvdasht, Kazeroun, Fasa, Jahrom and several cities around Shiraz. The founding indicates that, the age group of 15 to 30 year-old more than the other age group, women more than men and, speakers with higher education, prefer to use the Standard Variety rather than their local varieties in social domains (family, education, work, street, media, and in elites’ discourse). Although the Standard Variety is dominant everywhere, local varieties are used by the native speakers to express their identity in informal social settings and live with these varieties alongside their family and acquaintances.

Keywords

Main Subjects

بشیرنژاد، حسن (1397). تحلیلی اجتماعی‏ـ شناختی بر جایگاه و کاربرد مازندرانی و فارسی در استان مازندران. فصلنامۀ زبان‏پژوهی. دورۀ 10، شمارۀ 27: 119-145.
دبیرمقدم، محمد، فاطمه یوسفی‏راد، ویدا شقاقی و سید محمود متشرعی (1397). زبان‏شناسی شناختی‏اجتماعی: رویکردی نوین به معنا و تنوعات زبانی. فصلنامۀ زبان‏شناسی اجتماعی. دورۀ دوم، شمارۀ دوم: 20-29.
مدرسی، یحیی (1387). درآمدی بر جامعه‏شناسی زبان. تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.
مدرسی، یحیی و شراره مظفری (1379). تأثیر نگرش گویشوران بر کاربرد تنوعات گونه‏ای زبان فارسی در استان فارس: پژوهشی اجتماعی‏ـ‏ شناختی. فصلنامة زبانشناسی اجتماعی. دورۀ دوم، شمارۀ اول: 22-50.
زندی، بهمن و بهزاد احمدی (1395). نام‏شناسی اجتماعی‏ـ‏ شناختی: حوزۀ نوین مطالعات میان‏رشته‏ای. فصلنامة مطالعات میانرشته‏ای در علوم انسانی. دورۀ نهم، شمارۀ 1: 99-127.
زندی، بهمن، مسعود بحرینی، مهدی سبزواری و راضیه مهدی‏ بیرقدار (1397). بررسی اجتماعی‏ـ شناختی تابو و حسن تعبیر در ساختارهای عبارات، اصطلاحات و ضرب‏المثل‏های فارسی و انگلیسی. جستارهای زبانی. دورۀ 9، شمارۀ 6: 317-334.
Berthele, R. (2010). Investigations into the Folk’s Mental Models of Linguistic Varieties, In: D. Geeraerts & J. R. Taylor (Eds.) Advances in Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Cognitive Linguistics Research. pp. 265-290. The Gruyter Mouton.
Chambers, J. K. (2003). Sociolinguistic Theory: Linguistic Variation and its Social Significance. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
Coulmass, Florian. (2005). Sociolinguistics: The study of speakers’ choices. Cambridge: Cambridge Univesity Press.
Eckert, P. (2012). Three Waves of Variation Study: The Emergence of Meaning in the Study of Sociolinguistic Variation. Annual Review of Anthropology. 41: 87–100.
Fishman, J. (1972a). Language in Sociocultural Change. Essays by Joshua A. Fishman. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Geeraerts, D. (2001). On Measuring Lexical Convergence. In Augusto Soares da Silva (ed.), Linguagem e Cognicao (pp. 51-61). Braga: Associacao Portuguesa de Linguistica.
Geeraerts, D. and G. Kristiansen. (2014). Cognitive Linguistics and Language Variation. In: Jeannette Littlemore & John Taylor, Companion to Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 202-217). Bloomsbury Publishing.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as a Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Baltimore, MA: University Park Press.
Holmes, J. (1992). Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London: Longman.
Hudson, R. A. (.1996). Sociolinguistics (2nd edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University
Kristiansen, G. (2003). How to do things with allophones: Linguistic stereotypes as cognitive reference points in social cognition. In: Cognitive Models in Language and Thought, CLR 24, René Dirven, Roslyn M. Frank, and Martin Pütz (eds.). (pp. 69-120). Berlin /New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kristiansen, Gitte. (2008). Style-shifting and Shifting Styles; a Sociocognitive approach to lectal variation. In Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Language Variation, Cultural Models, Social Systems. CLR 39. Gitte Kristiansen and Rene Dirven (eds.) (pp. 45-88). Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Centre for Applied Linguistics.
Labov, W. (1984). Field Method of the Project on Linguistic Change and Variation. In: J. Baugh & J. Sherzer (ed.s), Language in Use. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice ttall.
Labov, W. (2010). Principles of Linguistic Change III: Cognitive and Cultural Factor. Wiley- Blackwell.
Langacker, R. W. (1999). A dynamic usage-based model. In: Ronald W. Langacker, Grammar and Conceptualization. (pp. 91-145). Berlin /New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Meyerhoff, M. (2006). Introducing Sociolinguistics. London: Routledge.
Romaine, Suzanne. (2003). Language Anthropology: Laguage and Gender. Encyclopedia of Life Support System (ELOSS).
Trudgill, P. (1974). The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Trudgill, P. (1983). On Dialect. Social and Geographical Perspective. Oxford