Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Linguistics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan

2 PhD in Linguistics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan

3 M.A. in Linguistics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of the addressee’s power on the type and number of giving advice strategies, such as “on record”, “negative politeness”, “two” and “three” combination, employed by Persian male and female university students based on Brown and Levinson’s (1987) theory.  A number of 60 M.A students (30 males and 30 females) from the University of Sistan and Baluchestan participated in this study. Discourse completion tests and role play techniques were utilized as two data gathering methods. The data were analyzed using the Chi-square test. The results of the two data collection methods show that the addressee’s power affects the type and the number of giving advice strategies and there is a significant relationship between the addressee’s power and the type as well as the number of giving advice strategies employed by male and female university students. The most frequent strategy type is the “negative politeness” strategies while the least frequent type are “don’t do face threatening act” strategies. As to the number of the strategies, the most frequent and less frequent ones are the combination of three and nine strategies respectively.

Keywords

Main Subjects

پیش‏قدم، رضا و عطاران، آتنا (1394). بررسی کنش‌گفتاری استدلال در زبان تبلیغات مجلات انگلیسی و فارسی. جستارهای زبانی. د6، ش3، ص64-45.
رحمانی، حسین (1397). تأثیر قدرت و جنسیت بر بی ادبی و شیوۀ برخورد با آن در نمایشنامۀ افول اثر اکبر رادی. زبانشناسی اجتماعی. د2، ش2، ص54-65.
زینلی‏دستوئی، صدیقه (1390). بررسی تأثیر قدرت و جنسیت مخاطب برنوع و تعداد راهبردهای عذرخواهی و ردکردن به‏کاربرده‏شده توسط دانشجویان سراوانی. پایان‏نامۀ کارشناسی‏ارشد. گروه زبان‏انگلیسی. دانشکدۀ ادبیات وعلوم انسانی. دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان.
شفقی، مریم (1392). کنش‌گفتاری «وعده» و «وعده در گفتمان سیاسی». جستارهای زبانی. د4،ش2، ص 158-141.
 شفقی، مریم و تمیم‏داری، احمد (1394). بررسی مشخصه‏های کنش‌گفتاری معذرت‏خواهی با مخاطب خداوند(توبه) در زبان فارسی و روسی. جستارهای زبانی. د6،ش5، ص 304-285.
صفوی، کوروش.(1390). درآمدی بر معناشناسی. تهران: انتشارات سورۀ مهر.
عموعلی اکبری نجف‏آبادی، شهلا (1385). قدرت اجتماعی- میان فردی و راهکردهای ادب در زبان فارسی. پایان نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد. گروه زبان  و ادبیات انگلیسی. دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی. دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان.
مدرسی، یحیی. (1368). درآمدی بر جامعه‏شناسی زبان. تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.
Al-Shboul, Y. & Zarei, N. (2013). Gender differences in the appropriateness of advice-giving among Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Language Learning & Applied Linguistics World (IJLLALW). 3(4), 88-98.
Babaie, Sh. & Shahrokhi, M. (2015). A cross-cultural study of offering advice speech acts by Iranian EFL learners and English native speakers: pragmatic transfer in focus. English Language Teaching. 8(6), 133-140.
Baxter, L. A. (1984). An investigation of compliance-gaining as politeness. Human Communication Research, 10(3),427-456.
Berger, C. R. (2008). Power, dominance, and social interaction. In: W. Donsbach (Ed.). The international encyclopedia of communication (pp.3848-3852). Blackewell Publishing.
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. & Kasper, G. (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Ablex, Norwood, NJ.
Borderia-Garcia, A. M. (2006). The acquisition of pragmatics in Spanish as a foreign language: Interpreting and giving advice. Doctoral dissertation. University of Iowa.
Brown, R., & Gilman, A. (1989). Politeness theory and Shakespeare's four major tragedies. Language in Society, 18(2), 159-212.
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
Farashian, A. & Muthusamy, P. (2016). Pragmatic variations in giving advice in L2 by Malaysian postgraduate students: The situational effects. English Language Teaching, 9(5), 179-191.
Farnia, M. & Abdul Sattar, H.Q. (2014). Advice strategies in English by Malay university students. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 5(3), 426-438.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction قitual: Essays on the face-to-face behaviour. New York: Doubleday Anchor Book.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (Eds.) Syntax and semantics: Speech acts.  (pp: 41-58). New York: Academic press.
Heidari, A., Eslami-Rasekh. A & Simin, S. (2015). Politeness strategies and power relations in disagreement. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning. 4(2), 33-41.
Hinkel, E. (1994). Appropriateness of advice as L2 solidarity strategy. RELC Journal. 25(2),71-93.
Hinkel, E. (1997). Appropriateness of advice: DCT and multiple choice data. Applied Linguistics. 18(1), 1-26.
Kwon, J. (2004). Expressing refusals in Korean and in American English. Multilingua. 23(4), 339–364.
Levenston, E. (1975). Aspects of testing the oral proficiency of adult immigrants to Canada. Papers on Language Testing. 19(74),67-74.
Martínez-Flor, A. (2013). Learners’ production of refusals: Interactive written DCT versus oral role-play. In Martí-Arnándiz, O. and Salazar-Campillo, P. (Eds.), Refusals in instructional contexts and beyond (pp.175-211). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401209717_010
Niroomand, M. (2012). An exploration of upper-intermediate Iranian EFL learners’ perception of politeness strategies and power relation in disagreement. English Language Teaching. 5(10), 180-191.
Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
Searle, J. (1976). The classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society. 5,1-24.
Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Watts, R. J., Ide S. & Ehlich, K. (eds.) (2005). Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory and practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.