Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD in General Linguistics, Alzahra University

2 Associate Professor of General Linguistics, Alzahra University

3 MSc. in Biostatistics, School of Rehabilitation, SUMS

Abstract

Every part of a conversation is related to what comes before or after, however, there is sometimes a long gap between the beginning and the end topic of the conversation. Hobbs (1990) calls this phenomenon “topic drift” and defines 4 types of coherence relations responsible for topic drift. Since the messages are displayed in a reverse chronological order and subsequently it is not obvious to which message the comment refers, maintaining coherence in multi-user computer-mediated communication is rather difficult. Moreover, intervening messages are observed among the messages that logically form a chain. As a result, one can consider the existence of coherence relations and analyze topic drift in conversations occurring on social media. In this paper, we have attempted to use Hobbs (1990) and Herring and Nix’s (1997) framework to investigate the coherence relations among 27 posts and 4881 comments on Instagram. In comments related to the main post, the order of coherence relations was “on topic and semantic parallelism” with the distances 3, 2 and 1 respectively, “break” with the distance 4, “explanation” with the distances 3, 2, and 1, and “metatalk” with the distances 0, 4, 3, 1, and 2. In comments forming intervening chains, the order of coherence relations can be defined as: “on topic” with distance 0, “explanation” with distances 1, 3 and 2, “Semantic parallelism” with distance 1, 3 and 2 and “metatalk” with distance zero and 2.

Keywords

رازقی، ثمینه (1398). بررسی دیوارنویسی و کامنت‏گذاری در شبکۀ اجتماعی اینستاگرام. رسالۀ دکتری زبان‌شناسی. دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران.
رازقی، ثمینه؛ ساسانی، فرهاد؛ مدرسی تهرانی، یحیی (1399). واکاوی متنیِ پیوستگی و گسستگی موضوعی در کامنت‌های اینستاگرام. پژوهش‏های تطبیقی زبان‏شناسی، 10 (19)، 97-83.
ساسانی، فرهاد. (1385). زمان در فضای مَجازی. پژوهش‌نامۀ فرهنگستان هنر، ویژۀ نشانه‌شناسی هنر،‌ 1، 74-65.
Boyd, D. M. & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1). available online at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html.
Dessalles, J. L. (2017). Conversational topic connectedness predicted by Simplicity Theory. In G. Gunzelmann, A.  Howes, T.  Tenbrink & E. Davelaar (Eds.), Proc. 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, (pp. 1914-1919). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Fu, T., Abbasi, A., & Chen, H. (2008). A Hybrid Approach to Web Forum Interactional Coherence Analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59 (8), 1195-1209.
Herring, S.C. (1999). Interactional Coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(4), available online at: http:/jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue4/herring. html
Herring, S.C. (2001). Computer-mediated Discourse. in D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen and H. Hamilton (eds). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 612–34). Oxford: Blackwell.
Herring, S.C. (2003). Dynamic Topic Analysis of Synchronous Chat. Symposium on New Research for New Media, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, available online at: http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/dta/html.
Herring, S.C. (2008a). Language and the Internet. In W. Donsbach (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Communication (pp. 2640-2645). Malden: Blackwell.
Herring, S.C. (2010). Digital media. In P. Hogan (Ed.), The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences. Cambridge University Press Reprint. available online at: http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/digmed.pdf
Herring, S.C. (2010). Computer-Mediated Conversation: Introduction and Overview,  Language@Internet, 7. available online at: http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2010/2801
Herring, S. C., Androutsopulous, J. (2015). Computer Mediated Discourse 2.0. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton and D. Schiffirin (eds), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Second Edition (pp. 127-151). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
Herring, S. C., Johnson, D. A., & DiBenedetto, T. (1992). Participation in electronic discourse in a ‘feminist’ field. In Locating Power: Proceedings of the 1992 Berkeley Women and Language Conference (pp. 250-262). Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group.
Herring, S. C., Nix, C. G. (1997). Is “Serious Chat” an Oxymoron? Pedagogical vs. Social Use of Internet Relay Chat. Paper presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Orlando, FL. available online at: http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/aaal.1997.pdf
Hobbs, J. (1990). Topic drift. In B. Doval (ed.), Conversational organization and its development (pp. 3-22). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Hobbs, J. R. (1985). On the coherence and structure of discourse. Technical Report CSLI-85-37, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University, 1-36.
Honeycutt, C., & Herring, S. C. (2009). Beyond Microblogging: Conversation and Collaboration via Twitter. Proceedings of the Forty-Second Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-42). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press. available online at: http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/webca.2008.pdf
Lambiase, J. J. (2009). Hanging by a Thread: Topic Development and Death in an Online Discussion of Breaking News. Language@Internet, 7. available online at: http://www.languageat internet.de/article/ 2010/2814/index_html/.
Panyametheekul, S., & Herring, S. C. (2003). Gender and turn allocation in a Thai chat room. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 9 (1). http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol9/issue1/panya_herring.html
Paolillo, J. C. (2001). Language variation in the virtual speech community: A social network approach. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5 (2), 180-213.
Park, A., Hartzler, A. L., Huh, J., Hsieh, G., McDonald, D. W., & Pratt, W. (2016). How Did We Get Here? Topic Drift in Online Health Discussions. J Med Internet Res, 18 (11). http://www.jmir.org/2016/11/e284 DOI:10.2196/jmir.6297.
Placencia, M. E., & Lower, A. (2013). Your kids are stinking cute.  Complimenting behaviour on Facebook among family and friends.  Intercultural Pragmatics, 10 (4), 617–646.
Potter. A. (2007). An investigation of interactional coherence in asynchronous learning environments. PhD dissertation, Nova Southeastern University.
Shiller, R. J. (1995). Conversation, information, and herd behavior. American Economic Review, 85 (2), 181-185.
Smith, M. A., & Fiore, A. (2000). Visualization Components for Persistent Conversations. Proceedings of CHI 2001 (pp. 233-240.), New York: ACM Press.
Stromer-Galley, J., and Martinson, A. M. (2009). Coherence in political computer-mediated communication: analyzing topic relevance and drift in chat. Discourse & Communication, 3 (2), 196-215.
van der Meij, H., de Vries, B., Boersma, K., Pieters, J., & Wegerif, R. (2005). An examination of interactional coherence in email use in elementary school. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(3), 417-439.
Venolia, G. D., & Neustaedter, C. (2003). Understanding Sequence and Reply Relationships within Email Conversations: A Mixed-Model Visualization. CHI, 5(1), 361-368.
Weger, H.J., & Aakhus, M. (2003). Arguing in Internet Chat Rooms: Argumentative Adaptations to Chat Room Design and Some Consequences for Public Deliberation at a Distance. Argumentation and Advocacy, 40(2), 23–38.
Yus, F. (2011). Cyberpragmatics. Internet-mediated Communication in Context. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Zelenkauskaite, A., & Herring, S.C. (2008). Television-mediated conversation: Coherence in Italian TV SMS chat. In: Proceedings of the 41th Hawaiian International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, CA:IEEE Press. available online at: http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/hicss08.pdf.