Abdollahzade, E. (2011). Poring over the findings: Interpersonal authorial engagement in applied linguistics papers.
Journal of Pragmatics,
43 (1), 288-297.
[1]
Babaii, E. (2011). Hard science, hard talk? The study of negative comments in physics book reviews. In F. Salager-Mayer, & B.A. Lewin (Eds.). Crossed Words, Criticism in Scholarly Writing (pp: 55-77). Switzerland: Peter Lang.
Babaii, E., Atai, M. R., & Saidi, M. (2017). Are scientists objective? An investigation of appraisal resources in English popular science articles. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 5 (1), 1-19.
Ben-Ari, E. T. (1999). When scientists write books for the public: The ups and downs, ins and outs, of writing popular science books. BioScience, 49 (10), 819-824.
Birot, S. (2008). Evaluation in media reporting: a comparative analysis in BBC, CNN and Aljazeera reports. Unpublished MA Dissertation, Department of English Language and Literature, University of Liverpool, UK.
Bowler, P. J. (2009). Science for all: The popularization of science in early twentieth-century Britain. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago and London.
Corbett, J. (2006). Popularizations. In R. E. Asher, & J. M., Simpson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, (pp. 755-759). UK: Peregamon Press.
Crismore, A., & Farnsworth, R. (1990). Metadiscourse in popular and professional science discourse. In W. Nash (Ed.), The writing scholar: Studies in academic discourse (pp. 118-136). Newsbury Park: Sage Publications.
Fahnestock, J. (1986/ 1998). Accommodating science: The rhetorical life of scientific facts. Written Communication, 3, 275-296. Reprinted in Written Communication, 15 (3), 330-350.
Fowler, R. (1996). Linguistic Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gallardo, S. (2005). Pragmatic support of medical recommendations in popularized texts. Journal of Pragmatics, 37 (6), 813-835.
Giannoni, D. S. (2008). Popularizing features in English journal editorials. English for Specific Purposes, 27 (2), 212-232.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Hempel, S., & Degand, L. (2008). Sequencers in different text genres: Academic writing, journalese and fiction. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 676-693.
Hyland, K. (2010). Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9 (2), 116-127.
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2005). Hooking the reader: A corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts. English for Specific Purposes, 24 (2), 123-139.
Lee, S. H. (2006). The use of interpersonal resources in argumentative/persuasive essays by East-Asian ESL and Australian tertiary students. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Sydney, Australia.
Lievrouw, L. A. (1990). Communication and the social representation of scientific knowledge. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7 (1), 1-10.
Malecki, I. (1981). The popularization of scientific research through human needs. In A. Forti, & P. Bisogne (Eds.), Research and Human Needs, (p. 107-112), UK: Peregamon Press.
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. P. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Miller, J. D. (2004). Public understanding of, and attitudes toward scientific research: What we know and what we need to know. Public Understanding of Science, 13 (3), 273-294.
Nur Aktas, R., & Cortes, V. (2008). Shell nouns as cohesive devices in published and ESL student writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7 (1), 3-14.
Nwogu, K. N. (1991). Structure of science popularizations: A genre-analysis approach to the schema of popularized medical texts. English for Specific Purposes, 10 (2), 111-123.
Parkinson, J., & Adendorff, R. (2004). The use of popular science articles in teaching scientific literacy. English for Specific Purposes, 23 (4), 379-396.
Ren, F., & Zhai, J. (2014). Communication and Popularization of Science and Technology in China. London: Springer.
Riesch, H. (2014). Why did the proton cross the road? Humor and science communication, Public Understanding of Science, 24 (7), 768-775.
Russell, N. (2010). Communicating science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sapp, G. (1995). Building a popular science library collection for high school to adult learners: Issues and recommended resources. USA: Greenwood Press.
Stotesbury, H. (2003). Evaluation in research article abstracts in the narrative and hard sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2 (4), 327-341.
Takahashi, B., & Tandoc Jr. E. C. (2015). Media sources, credibility, perception of science: Learning about how people learn about science. Public Understanding of Science, 24 (1), 174-192.
Varttala, T. (1999). Remarks on the communicative function of hedging in popular science and specialist research articles of Medicine. English for Specific Purposes, 18 (2), 177-200.
White, P. R. R. (1998). Telling media tales: The news story as rhetoric. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. University of Sydney, Sydney.
Zhang, G. (2015). It is suggested that ….. or it is better to….? Forms and meanings of subject it- extraposition in academic and popular writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20 (1), 1-13
[1]. metadiscourse markers
)