Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student in General Linguistics, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of General Linguistics, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran

3 Assistant Professor of General Linguistics, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The present study was conducted with the aim of critically analyzing the first discourse of Trump and Rouhani on the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) Program from the perspective of Systemic Functional Grammar (Halliday, 1985).  To this end, the first speech of the two presidents on the subject of the JCPOA were selected and transcribed for analyses. Both qualitative and quantitative analyses including frequency and Mann-Whitney statistical tests were used for data analyses. Findings revealed the hidden ideologies of the two previous presidents of the United States and Iran, which were Iranophobia and Anti-Americanism respectively. Both were found to emphasize his positive self-presentation and other’s negative presentation. Both intended to put each other into blame for the chaos in the region. Rohani highlighted the national unity, the role of the Revolutionary Guard in the assistance of the oppressed people of the region, and Iran’s role in the provision of peace and calm in the region, whereas Trump referred to Iran’s Nuclear ambitions and the Revolutionary Guard’s role in the ignition of fire of unrest and chaos in the region. Moreover, results showed that Functional Grammar could be used alone to critically analyze political discourses, and also with the help of three experiential, interpersonal and textual metafunctions, this language model can analyze the speeches of both presidents.  Moreover, the ideologies behind each text could be identified and their purposes be disclosed based on the elements in each metafunction such as the use of pronouns, tenses, adverbs, processes and themes used in both texts.

Keywords

Main Subjects

سلطانی، علی‏اصغر (۱۳۸۴). قدرت، گفتمان و زبان. تهران: نشر نی.
فرکلاف، نورمن (1390). تحلیل گفتمان انتقادی. ترجمة پیران و همکاران. تهران: مرکز مطالعات و تحقیقات رسانه‏ها.
یارمحمدی، لطف‏الله (۱۳۸۳). گفتمان‏شناسی رایج و انتقادی. تهران: هرمس.
 
Däubler, T., Benoit, K., Mikhaylov , S., & Laver, M. (2012). Natural sentences as valid units for codes political texts. British Journal of Political Science, 42 (4), 937 ­ 951.
Fairclough, N. (1988). Language and power. London: Longman Group UK Limited.
Halliday, M. A. K (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd. 
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 6(2), 173-192.
Jorgensen, M.W., & Philips, L.J. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage publication
Kress, G. (1985). Linguistic processes in sociocultural practices. Victoria: Deakin University Press.
O’Halloran, K. A. (2003). Critical discourse analysis and language cognition. London: Routledge.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Harlow: Longman.
Scotto di Carlo, G. (2014). The role of proximity in online popularizations: The case of TED talks. Discourse Studies, 16 (5), 591-606.
Sharifi far, M., & Rahimi, E. (2015). Critical discourse analysis of political speeches: A case study of Obama's and Rouhani's speeches at UN. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(2), 343-349.
Wang J. (2010). A critical discourse analysis of Barack Obama's speeches. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(3), 254-261.