References
Akmajian, A., Demers, R., Farmer, A. & Harnish, R. (2010). Linguistics; an Introduction to Language and Communication. 6th Edition. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Andeson, J. M. (2007). The Grammar of Names. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Banaruee, H., Khoshsima, H., Khatin-Zadeh, O. & Askari, A. (2017). Suppression of semantic features in metaphor comprehension, Cogent Psychology, 4:1, 1409323, 1-6.
Barcelona, A. (2003). Names: A metonymic ‘return ticket’ in five languages. Jezikoslovlje. 4(1): 11-41.
Chiwanga, F. E. & Mkiramweni, N. P. (2019). Ethno-ornithology and onomastics in the Natta community, Serengeti district, Tanzania. Heliyon. (5): 1-6.
Clark, E. & Clark, H. (1979). When nouns surface as verbs. Language. 55: 767-811.
Coates, R. (2005). A new theory of properhood. In E. Brylla and M. Wahlberg (eds.), vol.1, (124-137).
Dastlan, M. (2022). The Process of Properization of Animal Common Nouns in Persian; A Study in the Framework of Cognitive Onomastics, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5, 4, (20), 23-31. [In Persian]
Dirven, R. (1999). Conversion as a conceptual metonymy of event schemata. In K. Panther & G. Radden (eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought, (275-287). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Falk, J. S. (1978). Linguistics and Language; A Survay of Basic Concepts and Implications. 2nd Edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Gary-prieur, M. (1991). Le nom propre constitue-t-il une catégorie linguistique?. Langue française. 92 (1), 4-25.
Givon, T. (2015). The adaptive approach to grammar. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, (43-64). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Glucksberg, S. & Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review. 97(1): 3–18.
Goosens, L. (1990). Metaphtonomy: the interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics. 1: 323-340.
Hanks, P. (2013). Lexical Analysis: Norms and Exploitations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hassandust, M. (2016). An Etymological Dictionary of the Persian Language, 2nd Edition. Tehran: The Academy of Persian Language and Literature. [In Persian]
Hudson, G. (2000). Essential Introductory Linguistics. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.
Kaplan, D. (1978). DTHAT. In P. cole, (ed.), Syntax and Semantics: pragmatics, (221-243). New York: Academic Press.
Kleiber, G. (1981). Problèmes de référence: descriptions définies et noms propres. Paris: Klincksieck.
Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G. (1998). Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics. 9.1: 37-77.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mignot, E. & Philippe. M. (2022). How proper names enter the lexicon – From the Central Intelligence Agency to CIA: the reduction of full denominative expressions interpreted as a means to achieve (greater) lexicalization. Lexis. Journal in English Lexicology. 20, 1-23.
Mohammadikhah, R. (2015). Drawing of Atlas Dialectics of Kabgiyan of Boirahmad Town. M.A. Thesis on Linguistics. Islamic Azad University Fars science and Research Branch. [In Persian]
Panther, K. & Thornburg, L. (2002). The role of metaphor and metonymy in English –er nominals. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast, (279-319). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Philippe, M. (2020). Le nominal propre. Étude du nom propre en anglais. Doctoral Thesis. Paris: Sorbonne Université.
Pollux, J. (1967). Onomasticon. Stuttgart: Teubner.
Sklyarenko, A. & Sklyarenko, O. (2005). Interrelationship between common nouns and proper nouns, in E. Brylla and M. Wahlberg (eds.), vol.1, (277–282).
Yule, G. (2014). The Study of Language. 5th Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zabeeh, F. (1968). What is in a Name? An Inquiry into the Semantics and Pragmatics of Proper Names. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
)