نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری آموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه پیام نور
2 دانشیار آموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه پیام نور
چکیده
جامعه‌پذیری و تعامل اجتماعی ویژگیهای اصلی برون‌گرایی هستند که سبب می‌شوند فرد از همنشینی و تعامل با افراد جامعه لذت ببرد، به فعالیت‌‌های جمعی تمایل بیشتری داشته باشد، ریسک‌پذیر و ماجراجو باشد، انگیزش را از دنیای بیرون از خویش جستجو کند، در تعاملات اجتماعی موفق‌تر باشد و به دنبال ایفای نقش‌‌های اجتماعی در گروه‌‌ها باشد. پژوهش حاضر ارتباط بین برون‌گرایی و مهم‌ترین ویژگیهای آن یعنی جامعه‌پذیری و تعامل اجتماعی با عملکرد بیان شفاهی و مؤلفه‌‌های آن شامل انسجام و روانی در گفتار، تلفظ، دقت دستوری و غنای واژگانی را مورد بررسی قرار می‌دهد. با این هدف، 257 فراگیر زبان انگلیسی در یک مصاحبۀ سنجش عملکرد بیان شفاهی شرکت کردند و سپس به پرس‌شنامۀ شخصیتی گلدبرگ (1999) پاسخ دادند. نتایج مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری حاکی از این است که برون‌گرایی و داشتن تمایل به تعاملات اجتماعی، تاثیر غیرمستقیم مثبت بر عملکرد بیان شفاهی فراگیران می‌گذارد. نتایج مورد بحث قرار گرفته و پیشنهادات ارائه گردیده است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
Apple, M. (2011). The big five personality traits and foreign language speaking confidence among Japanese EFL students. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Japan Temple University.
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2001). A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality. EuropeanJournal of Personality, 15: 327–353. doi: 10.1002/per.417
Bae, J., & Bachman, L. F. (2010). An Investigation of four writing traits and two tasks across two languages. Language Testing, 27(2), 213-234.
Barekat, M., & Tabatabaei, O. (2013). Relationship between the Big Five Personality Traits and L2 Speaking Ability: A case of Iranian University Students, Journal of Social Issues & Humanities,1(3), 42-47.
Berry, V. (2004). A study of the interaction between individual personality differences and oral performance test facets. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. King's College, University of London.
Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
Brown, H. D. (1993). Principles of language learning and teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
Carrell, P., Prince, M., & Astika, G. (1996). Personality type and language learning in an EFL context, Language Learning,46, 75-99.
Carroll, S. (1999). Putting “input” in its proper place. Second Language Research, 15, 337-388.
Coan, R., & Catelle, R. (1966), Early school personality questionnaire. Champaign, III: Institute for personality and ability testing.
Dewaele, J., & Furnham, A. (1999). Extraversion: the unloved variable in applied linguistic research. Language Learning, 49, 509-44.
Dornyie, Z., & Kormos, J. (2000).The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance .Language teaching research, 4, 275-300.
Ehreman, M. (2008). Personality and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed). Lessons from good language learner (pp. 61-72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ehrman, M., & Oxford, R. (1995). Cognition plus: Correlates of language learning success. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 67–89.
Ellis, R. (1991). The interaction hypothesis: A critical evaluation. Paper presented at the Regional Language Center Seminar, Singapore, (ERIC document no. ED338037).
Fultcher, G., & Davidson, F. (2007). Language testing and assessment: An advanced resource book. London. New York:Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
Gann, Z. (2011). An investigation of personality and L2 oral performance, Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(6), 1259-1267.
Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, Interaction, and the second Language Learner. Mahwal, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2007). Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 175-199). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Graziano, W. G., & Tobin, R. M. (2002). Agreeableness: Dimension ofpersonality or social desirability artifact? Journal of Personality, 70, 695–727.
Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-band width, public domain, personality measuring the lower-level facets of several five factor models. Personality psychology in Europe, 7, 7-28.
Iwashita, N., Brown, A., McNamara, T., & O’Hagan, S. (2008). Assessed levels of second language speaking proficiency: How distinct? Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 24–49.
Khany, R., & Ghoreyshi, M. (2013). The nexus between Iranian EFL students’ big five personality traits and foreign language speaking confidence. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences: Special Issue on Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 601-611.
Kuiken, F. , & Vedder, I. (2007). Task complexity and measures of linguistic performance in L2 writing, International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 261–84.
Lantolf, J.P. , & Poehner, M.E. (Eds). (2008). Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages. London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329–358.
Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (1999).How Languages are Learned. New York: Oxford University Press.
Long, M. H. (1981). Input, interaction, and second language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379, 259-278.
Long, M. H. (2000). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. In R. Lambert & E. Shohamy (Eds.), Language policy and pedagogy: Essays in honor of Ronald Walton (pp. 181-96). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective. New York: Guilford Press.
Naiman, N., Frohlich, M., Stern, M. M., & Todesco, A. (1996). The good language learner. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, UK.
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2003). Defining and measuring SLA. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 716–761). London: Blackwell.
Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics,4(24), 492–518.
Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies. What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle: Heinle Publishers.
Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second language acquisition? Conditions, processes, and outcomes. Language Learning, 44(3), 449-72.
Rahimi, R., & Ahangari, S. (2016). The relationship between big five personality traits and the amount of speaking among Iranian EFL learners, Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(1), 9-16.
Robson, G. (1992). Individual learner differences and classroom participation: A pilot study. Unpublished paper, Temple University, Japan.
Rothman, E., & Coterz, E.P., (2003). The big five personality dimensions and job performance. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 29(1), 68-74.
Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp.199-227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shvidko, E. (2016). Second language socialization in English programs: Two cases. ELT Research Journal, 5(3), 193-204.
Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency and Lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532.
Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 158–164.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371-391.
Verhoeven, N., & Vermer, A. (2002). Communicative competence and personality dimensions in first and second language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23(03), 361-374.
)